
A First Course in Linear Algebra
A.G. Hamilton · Study material generated by AI from this edition. Not affiliated with the publisher.

A.G. Hamilton · Study material generated by AI from this edition. Not affiliated with the publisher.
Chapter 8 · pp. 90–95
This chapter revisits solving linear equations using matrix ideas: rank, invertibility and the augmented matrix. The main question is how to tell, from ranks alone, whether a system has no solution, exactly one, or infinitely many. You will also see how many free parameters a solution needs. (p. 90)
A set of linear equations in unknowns can be written as one equation, . Here is the matrix of coefficients, is the -vector of unknowns, and is the -vector of right-hand sides. (p. 90)
Example: the system , has with rows and , unknowns , and .
Every such system falls into exactly one of three cases: no solution, exactly one solution, or infinitely many solutions. (p. 90)
The augmented matrix is with added as an extra last column. Gaussian elimination (GE) is done on this matrix. The first columns change in exactly the same way as when GE is applied to alone. This is why we can compare the two matrices and their ranks. (p. 90)
A system is inconsistent when, after GE, the last non-zero row is all zeros except for its final entry, for example . That row would say .
In terms of rank, such a row counts as a non-zero row of , but its left part is a zero row of . So has a higher rank than . This gives the key rule:
has a solution if and only if . (p. 90)
Example 8.3(i) has a singular matrix . After GE, has rank 2, but ends with a row and has rank 3. The ranks differ, so there is no solution. (p. 91)
Homogeneous systems. If , the system is always consistent, because setting every unknown to zero works. In rank terms, adding a column of zeros to cannot create a new non-zero row, so automatically. (p. 90)
Suppose a solution exists. Is it unique? For a square matrix , the answer depends on whether is invertible.
Invertible . Multiply both sides of on the left by . This gives . Any solution must equal this, so there is exactly one. An invertible matrix has rank , so no parameters are needed. (p. 92)
Example: for , , the determinant of is , which is not zero, so is invertible. Here , and . Check: and .
Singular . If is singular, GE on leaves a last row of all zeros. For there are two possibilities for the last row:
So a singular gives either no solutions or infinitely many, never exactly one. (p. 92)
Example 8.3(ii) has a singular matrix. After GE, both and have rank 2, which is less than 3. The last row of is all zeros, so there are infinitely many solutions. (p. 91)
For a matrix of rank , suppose is also . Then the solutions need
parameters. The reason is that each unit of rank fixes one unknown through a leading 1, and the remaining unknowns can be chosen freely. If , there are 0 parameters, so the solution is unique. (pp. 92–93)
A question to think about: could a system have a solution set with three parameters? Yes, if the rank is 1.
Process for a consistent system with free unknowns:
Example 8.4 (two parameters). GE reduces the system to a single equation, , because the other rows become zero. Let and . Then . The rank is 1 and , so parameters. (pp. 91, 93)
Example 8.5 (, rank 2). After GE, only two non-zero rows remain:
Let and . The second equation gives . Substituting into the first gives . Two parameters, matching . (p. 93)
Now let be . The equation has a unique solution if and only if , the number of columns. (pp. 92, 94)
The reasoning: a unique solution needs a leading 1 in every column. So after GE, the first rows have 1s on the diagonal positions with zeros below. Any further rows must be all zeros. This is exactly the situation where both ranks equal . (p. 94)
Example 8.6. Here is , so . Four possible GE outcomes are:
Fewer equations than unknowns. If , then . The rank can never reach , so a unique solution is impossible. The system has either no solutions or infinitely many. For example, two equations in three unknowns can never pin down a single point. (p. 94)